Interesting question, why do people become leftwing or rightwing?
Personally, i'm not sure i was even aware of a left or right wing ideology when i become 'a lefty', i had my views and later found out that they chimed with the Left but then my parents were both Lefties so it could have been i was raised to have those views from a young age, i also grew up in the era of Margaret Thatcher and her cruel right wing ideology so that probably had an effect also.
Maybe it is nothing to do with nurture and is down to nature as perhaps some people are just drawn to a certain side of an ideology but i lean more towards it being a result of parenting, society and our own experiences or even out of antagonism towards ideological parents and their upbringing.
I asked someone at the Political Psychology Section at the British Psychological Society and they seemed to think that it is a bit of Nature and Nurture, Nature designates our temperament and our emotional experiences and Nurture which shapes our sensitivities and emotional responses. The strongest emotion, they said, is empathy and how much we empathise with others and the more empathy we hold, the more a person will lean to the left and less empathy often result in leaning more to the right.
They did say that political ideology is not fixed though and as we live our life social tribes, exposure to other ideas, friends, family, media, teaching, what we read and learn all go into our ideology all mixed with a healthy dash of a private inner sense of what is right and wrong.
Very interesting, i love a bit of Psychology and I am sure they know what they are talking about but i always refer back to a 2013 study published in Psychological Science that found people with right-wing views are less intelligent than those of us with left wing views.
The British Cohort Study found that right-wingers tend to be less intelligent, have lower reasoning ability and more racist and homophobic views than left-wingers and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to hold right-wing views.
Nice to have it clarified by science and remember if you are unfortunate enough to come across a Right Winger, remember talk slow to them...they are not too bright (or they had right wing parents and therefore little empathy).
FOAB Information
▼
what? Did you just write that “greed” isn't the strongest emotion? Surely you jest as that is the favorite “attack point” of the left. Shocking!
ReplyDeletebtw, anybody that thinks empathy is a stronger emotion than fear is stupid - including psychology phd's and researchers...
for the record, very few leftists opt for poverty and starvation for the good of others (at times not even for their children)...
in fact, leftist ideology sucks so bad, places like cuba, ussr, china, north korea had to police their borders to keep their populations from leaving (maybe escaping more apt). surely you remember that? maybe those are facts you dispute?
certainly east germany sucked compared to west germany. taiwan wants nothing to do with communist china. south koreans want nothing to do with north korea. why do so many people want to get away from the ideals of the left? Hmmmmmm hmmmmm
as far as leftist thinking goes, the argument is clear...
> its nice to drop a coin in a beggars hat.
> its nice to pay some tax to provide minimal food, clothing, and shelter (health care is a big ask, especially for people that abuse their bodies and minds with drugs, obesity, alcohol, etc.).
> its nice to give to the church and charities that provide food banks, clothing, etc.
but, for nations, leftist ideology is a stupid disaster. too many people are willing to take the charity (and i do mean take) without working for it, and there are enough leftist leaders to use the power of police/military to force the charity (and i do mean force) while the leadership live like royalty...
so, despite your superior intelligence,
> continue telling yourself that you are more intelligent, and that you have fewer faults (you might believe that shit one day).
> continue finding ways to degrade people that disagree with you (not with reality based logic, but with mythical equity logic).
> continue advocating for autocratic governing where the "representatives of the people" corruptly abuse the populace under the guise of being empathetic. Say to yourself, "yes, i will go to bed hungry tonight so that people on the other side of the world can have a bowl of rice. hopefully, one day, we will all live in an empathetic world with equitable discomfort... one day, one day... I’m more intelligent and my empathy overcomes my fear… one day, one day…"
> continue selectively picking “scientific/expert” views that support your ideology - even when the scientist/expert is an idiot…
meanwhile, despite my low intelligence (how did i earn so much money, get 4 degrees, and 112 patents? damn)
> i will enjoy my multi-million-dollar retirement
> i will use my limited intelligence to recognize that leftist leaders are power hungry tyrants due to human nature
> i will use my limited intelligence to recognize that every leftist nation has failed miserably due to human nature
surely you will go to sleep tonight on the floor, with one thread bare blanket, hungry, and unwashed so those people living in squalor in the uk have a better life, right? then tomorrow, having fixed the uk, you will repeat the process for the people of india… then china… then north korea… then the poor and languishing in france (let’s not forget their poor), then venezuela (you should be hungry even if maduro eats a fine meal), then… on and on and on and on and on…
at least my low intelligence keeps me from being taken advantage of and keeps me from pissing into the wind…
oh yeah, did i mention that “someone at the Political Psychology Section at the British Psychological Society” is a moron?
maybe you should ask if their uncle fidel paid for their education?
best lucyp
ps - psychologists use the "big 5" model to discuss and analyze personalities. it is also known as OCEAN. the O stands for openness. openness to new ideas is the primary indicator of someone leaning left. the C stands for conscientiousness. conscientiousness is the primary indicator of someone leaning right.
ReplyDeletethe way it plays out is like this:
- leftists are willing to try things with less concern for the consequences of failure... what doesn't kill you makes you stronger...
- rightists prefer to manage risks to minimize the negative consequences of failure...
hopefully, eventually, leftists will realize that marx and leftist ideology does not work... you would think ussr, cuba, north korea, venezuela would be enough evidence that marx was wrong.
maybe the left isn't so intelligent. what was that old saying, "insanity is trying the same over and over and expecting different results."
"...same thing over and over..."
ReplyDeletei noticed that about you
ReplyDeleteif you stopped posting articles based on marxist ideology i would stop posting all the reasons your articles are wrong.
ReplyDelete