Time around the World is strange. In Britain at the moment it is 23:15 and in France it is 22:15 meanwhile it in America it is the mid 1930's Germany as the Trump Administration turn up the full fascist, or so i thought because scholars and historians i spoke to have it closer to the mid 1920's, mid 1920' Italy to be precise.
Benito Mussolini is considered the creator and founder of Fascism, developing the ultra right wing ideology and where most people would associate the present Trump Administration with early Hitler, historians argue that the comparison is stronger with Il Duce than any with Adolf Hitler who took what Mussolini had, and made it his own.
The similarity, according to people who study these things, are like Mussolini, Trump uses simplified, repetitive, and emotionally charged language to bypass traditional media and connect directly with a mass movement rather than just a political party and both tried to cultivate an image of hyper masculinity and alpha-male dominance.
Mussolini’s promised to restore the glory of the Roman Empire parallels the 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) slogan and both centered their platforms on the idea that the nation had been weakened by corrupt elites and 'internal enemies' and only they could restore its past greatness.
Both tried to dismantle democratic norms such as the judiciary and the press as well as trying to manipulate media outlets and both relied heavily on nepotism in their inner circle, Mussolini’s appointment family members to his ministry and so has Trump with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump in official advisory roles.
Both have Paramilitaries doing their dirty work. Il Duce had the Blackshirts causing systematic street violence while Trump has ICE currently doing the same while both utilised the technology of their time to bypass traditional gatekeepers such as Mussolini who created LUCE, a government agency that produced propganda newsreels shown in every cinema while Trump created Truth Social which enabled him to speak direct to his followers without censure and cause a constant barrage of misinformation designed to make the public question reality.
Experts have linked Trump’s use of alternative facts to Mussolini’s methods, where the leader's declarations are promoted as the only truth, dismissing established facts as lies.
Like Mussolini, he cast established journalists as 'enemies' and attempted to replace them with a direct, unmediated 'truth' so Mussolini and Trump both positioned themselves as truth-tellers in a landscape they characterised as dominated by a corrupt and dishonest press and positioned themselves as the only ones to believe despite what the evidence showed.
Both tried to centralise power, attacked and attempted to prosecute opposition and targetted minority groups and while Trump often wears hats that says 'Trump was Right about everything', this is almost the same as Mussolini’s slogan 'Mussolini is always right'.
Mussolini’s face was plastered on posters, buildings, and textbooks across Italy to create a sense of omnipresence while the U.S. context is different but Trump is keen to have his name associated with everything and have his name on everything.
While Mussolini scapegoated Bolsheviks, plutocrats and ethnic minorities, Trumps administration targets the Deep State, radical leftists and illegal immigrants.
The slogan, One of Ours, All of yours' which the Trump administration used when defending the ICE agents after they killed a US citizen, is not directly attributed to Mussolini himself but was used within the context of Nazism in general,particularly in relation to the tactics used by Benito Mussolini’s Italian Fascist regime to eliminate opposition and demand total obedience to the state.
Finally Fascism was inherently expansionist and Trump has wanted to add Greenland as well as mentioning adding Panama and even Canada to the United States so make of that what you will but as we all know Mussolini was overthrown by his own side and hung upside from a lamppost and as the American people stir to protest what is happening there, we can only wait to see if the comparison runs right through to the end.

6 comments:
weak
Which part of the comparison do you disagree with?
every american politician uses "simplified, repetitive and emotionally charged language." easy to declare since those are all subjective.
what trump is doing is no more of a mass movement than biden and dei and black lives matter.
obama was going to remake america, biden was going to fix what trump destroyed, trump is going to undo the damage of obama and biden... all the same crap. you get elected by promising a better future - make things better
trump hasn't tried the bypass the justice system anymore than the democrats who now file a lawsuit to counter every executive order, and who pushed the fbi (under obama) to file knowingly false fisa warrants.
trump's "paramilitaries" are the same entities that every president has had. he did not create any new policing entities...
trump has not bypassed any laws. ICE was created to enforce US immigration law. biden blocked ICE. obama used ICE aggressively.
biden, obama, clinton and W all presented "alternative facts" and presented them as indisputable... not to mention that the democrats knowingly hid biden's mental incompetence
90% of US journalists are trump's enemies... how has trump "attempted" to replace the US media? there are the same number of news stations, networks, newspapers, etc. as always...
biden and obama both had several of trump's associates arrested an prosecuted...
what does it mean to "centralize power"? and what has trump done that democrats haven't tried to do to centralize power?
every US president has their face plastered everywhere... every post office, every federal building, every military base...
the democrats scapegoat the rich, large businesses, republicans, and the radical right. how is that different?
one of ours, all of yours is nazism? then what the heck is black lives matter?
fascism was inherently expansionist... when the US actually occupies greenland, venezuela, and panama get back to me...
every item described is based on passive language, subjective language, and uses inductive logic. i have no doubt that the "experts" believe their logic to be beyond disputation but it is as pathetic as the far right saying that obama wasn't born in the US.
the logic the "experts" used is a great of example of human creativity. their logic equates to that of conspiracy theorists.
it would not surprise me to find that the "experts" have never voted for any candidate that wasn't left or far left, like 90% of the US media, 95% of universities professors, and 95% of hollywood actors...
Franco was mentioned as was Pinochet but Il Duce was mentioned more. It was the almost blatant use of Fascist slogans that struck me as if hiding in plain sight. Either that or whoever decides these things is having a laugh. The ‘One of ours’ phrase is pretty well known as a fascist slogan as I have heard that before.
i don't think it is for a laugh, but maybe it is. some people are driven by motives that i don’t understand.
some people over-index on events and words they cannot control. they take a few incidents and escalate them out of proportion (the 2 killings in minnesota by ice should have been deescalated, but they are two out of thousands of ice arrests. and the last guy was carrying a gun while interfering with a police action, which is dumb - out of proportion).
their own lives are often a mess and yet, they are worried about "fairness", and equity, and events that happened 200 years ago. i don't get it. fix you own problems first.
in the US, politics cannot be more polarized and:
> the press profits from it and keeps it polarized. as does social media. as do enemies of the US.
> russia, iran, and china are undisputed masters of using disinformation. they will observe an event and post comments that cause emotions to explode on the right, then post comments that cause emotions to explode on the left, playing both ends against the middle. and our political parties lack principles and seek one thing, power.
-- people on the left have taken trumps words literally when he clearly joking
-- people have taken many of his words out of context
-- he often says things just to get a reaction, and the people that react don't try to see thru it
-- he has said stupid things
-- if his words are unclear, the left, press, social media use the most negative interpretation they can imagine
-- i've not heard trump or his administration use the phrase "one of ours"
-- in the US, hitler, mussolini, and nazis were reviled in all levels of schooling. the only people that i have ever seen embrace these ideals were also members of the kkk.
many of my friends qualify as “rednecks”, and after 50 years of friendship i have never seen one of them have anything but ire for nazis and racists. further, my redneck friends have and would again side with blacks against skinheads…
i'm not as concerned by words as much as i am actions. words and talk are cheap. actions are real. But lots of people are like a bomb triggered by words.
trump says things to get his antagonists to react emotionally. it is my observation that he does this to gain an advantage. so those people that over-index on words fall for it. here are 2 examples:
> the US is not going to use force to take greenland, though it does seem to present a strategic weakness now that the arctic has receded. denmark's military is small and weak, and they don't the money or motive to change that - we will end up with amicable deal.
> we don't need canada for anything. and we don't want it. those were just words to stir up the left in canada - we get lots of opinions from canadians about how much the US sucks... he played their left, and it worked
whatever
Post a Comment