Switzerland isn't known for much apart from Cuckoo Clocks, yodelling and chocolate. You would be hard pushed to make a list of famous Swiss people without resorting to using the fictional characters William Tell and Heidi.
What Switzerland has got going for it is Roger Federer who is arguably the greatest tennis player ever to throw his balls up in the air.
Usually when one player dominates in any sport, it gets a bit tedious but there seems to be something about Roger that people like. When Sampras was dominating, everyone seemed to be willing him to lose but it is difficult to find anyone with a bad word to say about Federer. He isn't particularly charismatic like an Agassi or funny like Nastase but nobody seems to mind that he wins with robotic regularity.
Here in the UK we have the World number 2 Andy Murray and even we don't like him and he is not in danger of wining anything anytime soon but here is Federer in yet another final, this time battling against the Argentine Juan Martin Del Potro, who is tipped to challenge the Fed for supremacy in the future but is looking out on his feet on the television behind me as Federer marches towards yet another title.
I don't know why everyone seems to take him to their heart but one tennis player whose popularity has taken a huge slump is Serena Williams.
Her and her sister have always had a bit of a feisty side to their nature but after the younger Williams sisters outrageous outburst at the line judge yesterday, she is going to be handed a well deserved slapping down.
Ungracious, nasty and uncalled for, she can expect to see that clip replayed for the rest of her career which hopefully will be much shorter now.
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
Sunday, 13 September 2009
All About Rebecca Grant
I got given some advice on how to attract more people to my blog after mentioning to one of the tech guys that my visitor numbers had dropped considerably recently.
Being far to polite to just say that it was purely down to the rubbish posts that i put up, he beckoned me closer and whispered in my ear that the secret was repeating keywords.
Obviously he noticed my blank look and explained that everything came down to the 'zeitgeist' and matching up what people write into search engines with words in the post.
Another blank look later and i was directed to the Google trend page.
The top words written into Google at that time were 'rebecca grant', so it was patiently explained that if i were to write a post about rebecca grant, and use the words rebecca grant as many times in the post as was possible, i would find myself towards the top of Google searches and as people don't delve deeper than a few pages, my blog would be visited more often.
Apparently this is how the more well known bloggers get such big numbers and it was a well known secret that i obviously had missed or just ignored because i tend to glaze over when the tech people start up.
The only problem is that unless you know anything about rebecca grant, which i don't, then the blogger is stuffed. Checking it now, the top words are nfl field pass which means nothing and would mean a 3 word post if i followed this method.
This does leave the dilemma of writing what you want on your blog and let whoever stumbles across it do so, or writing things according to a top 10 list which would attract readers but meant writing things to order as it were, which you cared nothing about.
I promised that i would give it a go and see what happens. Oh and before i forget, whatever you did rebecca grant to make yourself so popular, well done/boo you (delete as applicable).
Being far to polite to just say that it was purely down to the rubbish posts that i put up, he beckoned me closer and whispered in my ear that the secret was repeating keywords.
Obviously he noticed my blank look and explained that everything came down to the 'zeitgeist' and matching up what people write into search engines with words in the post.
Another blank look later and i was directed to the Google trend page.
The top words written into Google at that time were 'rebecca grant', so it was patiently explained that if i were to write a post about rebecca grant, and use the words rebecca grant as many times in the post as was possible, i would find myself towards the top of Google searches and as people don't delve deeper than a few pages, my blog would be visited more often.
Apparently this is how the more well known bloggers get such big numbers and it was a well known secret that i obviously had missed or just ignored because i tend to glaze over when the tech people start up.
The only problem is that unless you know anything about rebecca grant, which i don't, then the blogger is stuffed. Checking it now, the top words are nfl field pass which means nothing and would mean a 3 word post if i followed this method.
This does leave the dilemma of writing what you want on your blog and let whoever stumbles across it do so, or writing things according to a top 10 list which would attract readers but meant writing things to order as it were, which you cared nothing about.
I promised that i would give it a go and see what happens. Oh and before i forget, whatever you did rebecca grant to make yourself so popular, well done/boo you (delete as applicable).
The Christian Party
While googling for the British Christian Party, i came across this doozy of the same name.
It's main concern is the 19th Amendment to the American Constitution, or to everyone else, the bit where it says 'The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.'
Apparently, this particular Christian Party are campaigning to get it repealed and quote God himself saying that he would 'greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children' as proof that even the big man upstairs thinks women are a bit on the dodgy side.
It then goes to dedicate the movement to every woman who voted to send men to Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, and Iraq, exercising authority over a man in violation of God's Law'.
Apparently it all comes down to men having three and a half billion more brain cells than a woman.
So because of this lack of grey matter, it is dangerous to give American women the vote because they constitute 11% more of the voters than men, so are directly responsible for who gets elected and as us women are such dumb asses, proves that 'the American woman can't be trusted as a responsible citizen, much less as an educated voter'.
To push the point that men are superior, the site offers such facts as:
Women are perpetrators of up to 60% of "domestic violence"
Less than 0.1% of Americans follow women's soccer.
A mother's involvement in her child's education reduces academic skills by 28-32%.
Granting women legal rights precipitated a fifty fold increase in the US divorce rate.
The increased divorce rate led directly to a ten fold increase in the murder rate.
American men commit suicide at a rate five times higher than American women
Can't argue with those stats, mostly because i just don't have the mental capacity to, being a woman and all and my mother helped me with my homework a few times. The site has to be an attempt at satire. Doesn't it?
It's main concern is the 19th Amendment to the American Constitution, or to everyone else, the bit where it says 'The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.'
Apparently, this particular Christian Party are campaigning to get it repealed and quote God himself saying that he would 'greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children' as proof that even the big man upstairs thinks women are a bit on the dodgy side.
It then goes to dedicate the movement to every woman who voted to send men to Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, and Iraq, exercising authority over a man in violation of God's Law'.
Apparently it all comes down to men having three and a half billion more brain cells than a woman.
So because of this lack of grey matter, it is dangerous to give American women the vote because they constitute 11% more of the voters than men, so are directly responsible for who gets elected and as us women are such dumb asses, proves that 'the American woman can't be trusted as a responsible citizen, much less as an educated voter'.
To push the point that men are superior, the site offers such facts as:
Women are perpetrators of up to 60% of "domestic violence"
Less than 0.1% of Americans follow women's soccer.
A mother's involvement in her child's education reduces academic skills by 28-32%.
Granting women legal rights precipitated a fifty fold increase in the US divorce rate.
The increased divorce rate led directly to a ten fold increase in the murder rate.
American men commit suicide at a rate five times higher than American women
Can't argue with those stats, mostly because i just don't have the mental capacity to, being a woman and all and my mother helped me with my homework a few times. The site has to be an attempt at satire. Doesn't it?
Friday, 11 September 2009
International Mystery
Secret trips and hush-hush meetings, there seems to be something very strange going on between Russia and Israel recently.
The Israeli prime minister left his office in Jerusalem on Monday, telling only a handful of aides where he was going. In public, staff said he was visiting a "security installation" in Israel, but on Wednesday night the prime minister's bureau issued an update saying he had been engaged in secret activity.
It now appears that Netanyahu flew to Moscow with his national security adviser and rather than taking an Israeli air force jet, they hired a private aircraft.
Last month the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, travelled to Russia and met with the Russian President just after a Russian cargo ship had been kidnapped.
Curious indeed and speculation abounds that it is tied to the Russian ship and it's cargo which is rumoured to have been surface to air missiles destined for Iran and not sliced up trees at all.
Of course Israel is worried that Iran would use the weapons to protect itself against any military strike, the rotters, but i love a good old international mystery.
It may be completely innocent and Netanyahu was just up to his old tricks. Last time he was in office he was doing to his public relations consultant exactly what he was doing to the Palestinians at the time, only they didn't get flowers afterwards.
The Israeli prime minister left his office in Jerusalem on Monday, telling only a handful of aides where he was going. In public, staff said he was visiting a "security installation" in Israel, but on Wednesday night the prime minister's bureau issued an update saying he had been engaged in secret activity.
It now appears that Netanyahu flew to Moscow with his national security adviser and rather than taking an Israeli air force jet, they hired a private aircraft.
Last month the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, travelled to Russia and met with the Russian President just after a Russian cargo ship had been kidnapped.
Curious indeed and speculation abounds that it is tied to the Russian ship and it's cargo which is rumoured to have been surface to air missiles destined for Iran and not sliced up trees at all.
Of course Israel is worried that Iran would use the weapons to protect itself against any military strike, the rotters, but i love a good old international mystery.
It may be completely innocent and Netanyahu was just up to his old tricks. Last time he was in office he was doing to his public relations consultant exactly what he was doing to the Palestinians at the time, only they didn't get flowers afterwards.
Thursday, 10 September 2009
Recession Over
That's it then. Recession over and all done and dusted in a little under 2 years.
I know it may not feel like it if you are living under a bridge because you lost your job and your house got repossessed but the National Institute for Economic and Social Research have spoken, and they say it's technically at an end. Phew.
A word of warning though before you get your hopes up and cancel that appointment with the shady doctor who was offering £500 for one of your kidneys, they say it is going to be a slow recovery with unemployment and repossessions continuing to rise for the next couple of years which sounds like the opposite of a recovery to me but then the inability to see such things is probably why i failed so gloriously on the economics exam.
Apparently manufacturing output rose by 0.9% in July and GDP increased by 0.2% in the three months to August with the NIESR expecting the UK economy to experience modest growth in the third quarter of this year,signalling happy days are here again. Well, sometime in 2011 anyway.
We know who to thank for getting us into the mess, but who's hand do we shake for getting us out of it again?
I expect Gordon Brown will break off from hugging Colonel Gaddafi long enough to claim a slice of the praise through stuffing billions into the bankers pockets and shaving pennies off shelf prices with a 2.5% VAT cut.
If only there was a question on that economics exam to explain how to save the economy. I know now that it's by us, aka the Innocent victims, getting to save 2p off a tin of chicken and mushroom soup while the bankers, aka the perpetrators, get pockets full of used notes and a healthy bonus.
Anyway, break out the super saver wine, splash out on a new cardboard box and let's celebrate the return of estate agents, big cars and banks treating us like dirt.
Raise a glass to your health and the next recession which should be coming around in a decade or so.
I know it may not feel like it if you are living under a bridge because you lost your job and your house got repossessed but the National Institute for Economic and Social Research have spoken, and they say it's technically at an end. Phew.
A word of warning though before you get your hopes up and cancel that appointment with the shady doctor who was offering £500 for one of your kidneys, they say it is going to be a slow recovery with unemployment and repossessions continuing to rise for the next couple of years which sounds like the opposite of a recovery to me but then the inability to see such things is probably why i failed so gloriously on the economics exam.
Apparently manufacturing output rose by 0.9% in July and GDP increased by 0.2% in the three months to August with the NIESR expecting the UK economy to experience modest growth in the third quarter of this year,signalling happy days are here again. Well, sometime in 2011 anyway.
We know who to thank for getting us into the mess, but who's hand do we shake for getting us out of it again?
I expect Gordon Brown will break off from hugging Colonel Gaddafi long enough to claim a slice of the praise through stuffing billions into the bankers pockets and shaving pennies off shelf prices with a 2.5% VAT cut.
If only there was a question on that economics exam to explain how to save the economy. I know now that it's by us, aka the Innocent victims, getting to save 2p off a tin of chicken and mushroom soup while the bankers, aka the perpetrators, get pockets full of used notes and a healthy bonus.
Anyway, break out the super saver wine, splash out on a new cardboard box and let's celebrate the return of estate agents, big cars and banks treating us like dirt.
Raise a glass to your health and the next recession which should be coming around in a decade or so.
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
Capitalism: A Love Story
Darkness fell upon the room and the chatter subsided to a low whisper. The curtains stirred and then slowly drew back to reveal a large, hairy figure stood before us. A distant memory flickered fleetingly in the depths of my mind. Slowly, the realisation dawned that a vision from our past had finally returned, searching for new victims to devour as the thing before us stepped out of the half-shadow and prepared to launch yet another onslaught onto its unsuspecting prey.
Well, this was only a trailer but those three minutes gave a wonderful taster of what to expect.
Armed with his trademark megaphone, cap and large belly, Michael Moore is back and the chubby champion of the left is aiming his fire this time at those that tread the path of Capitalism and who brought the entire system to the very edge of ruin last year.
As much as i admire Mr Moore, i would be the first to admit that he isn't the best of this type of film maker out there and his style is crude and confrontational but he does have a wonderful knack of getting beneath the skin and hitting the right buttons of those he sets out to demonise.
As my views are pretty much in line with Michael Moore's, i am very happy to see him making the top banana's uncomfortable even though i would like to see him adopt a more considered style that sees him pose some difficult questions to his victims rather than just be bundled out the door and then heckle them from the pavement outside.
The right wing will set out to belittle him and whatever proof he holds up of a corrupt capitalist system because they see the danger in his ability to reach a large global audience, and they hate that because it gets people talking and shines a light on things that they would prefer were kept hidden.
The one strand of the film that i think will make an impact is the little reported story of the privatised youth detention centre, run with the help of a local judge who was found guilty of wrongly convicting 6500 children for minor transgressions, for a cut of the profits.
We need people like Michael Moore inflicting pain with shocking stories like this and i say long may he continue brandishing his megaphone in anger at the deserving.
Well, this was only a trailer but those three minutes gave a wonderful taster of what to expect.
Armed with his trademark megaphone, cap and large belly, Michael Moore is back and the chubby champion of the left is aiming his fire this time at those that tread the path of Capitalism and who brought the entire system to the very edge of ruin last year.
As much as i admire Mr Moore, i would be the first to admit that he isn't the best of this type of film maker out there and his style is crude and confrontational but he does have a wonderful knack of getting beneath the skin and hitting the right buttons of those he sets out to demonise.
As my views are pretty much in line with Michael Moore's, i am very happy to see him making the top banana's uncomfortable even though i would like to see him adopt a more considered style that sees him pose some difficult questions to his victims rather than just be bundled out the door and then heckle them from the pavement outside.
The right wing will set out to belittle him and whatever proof he holds up of a corrupt capitalist system because they see the danger in his ability to reach a large global audience, and they hate that because it gets people talking and shines a light on things that they would prefer were kept hidden.
The one strand of the film that i think will make an impact is the little reported story of the privatised youth detention centre, run with the help of a local judge who was found guilty of wrongly convicting 6500 children for minor transgressions, for a cut of the profits.
We need people like Michael Moore inflicting pain with shocking stories like this and i say long may he continue brandishing his megaphone in anger at the deserving.
Saturday, 5 September 2009
My Kind Of First Lady
It can't be easy being a first lady. You have to find the right balance between appearing the supportive wife and keeping enough distance from the political side of things. As Cherie Blair discovered when she mentioned that she believed in the power of crystals, you will get pilloried mercilessly as a flake if you say or do anything deemed unworthy of the wife of the elected representative.
Not so in Japan where the new first lady, Miyuki Hatoyama, announced that she was abducted by aliens as she slept one night and was whisked off in a triangular shaped UFO to Venus.
As a follow up to that bombshell she then passed on her breakfast-time habit of eating the centre piece of our Solar System, demonstrating how she tears pieces off an imaginary sun saying 'Yum, yum, yum. It gives me enormous energy. My husband has recently started doing that too."
She also makes her own clothes from hemp coffee bags and as demonstrated during the election campaign, can also do a very passable Moonwalk and claims to have known Tom Cruise in a previous life.
Yes, she is obviously a raving loonie but how much fun would she be to have around at the next meeting of World leaders which has lacked a seriously mad personality since Boris Yeltsin departed.
They can wheel out all plans to save the global economy that they want, all we want to hear about is what Mrs Hatoyama has been up to since the last time she updated us.
It's what we need, powerful world leaders with embarrassing spouses. I hope you are paying attention Sarah Brown, the bar has been set and we expect you to at least do some break dancing at the upcoming Labour Party Conference.
Not so in Japan where the new first lady, Miyuki Hatoyama, announced that she was abducted by aliens as she slept one night and was whisked off in a triangular shaped UFO to Venus.
As a follow up to that bombshell she then passed on her breakfast-time habit of eating the centre piece of our Solar System, demonstrating how she tears pieces off an imaginary sun saying 'Yum, yum, yum. It gives me enormous energy. My husband has recently started doing that too."
She also makes her own clothes from hemp coffee bags and as demonstrated during the election campaign, can also do a very passable Moonwalk and claims to have known Tom Cruise in a previous life.
Yes, she is obviously a raving loonie but how much fun would she be to have around at the next meeting of World leaders which has lacked a seriously mad personality since Boris Yeltsin departed.
They can wheel out all plans to save the global economy that they want, all we want to hear about is what Mrs Hatoyama has been up to since the last time she updated us.
It's what we need, powerful world leaders with embarrassing spouses. I hope you are paying attention Sarah Brown, the bar has been set and we expect you to at least do some break dancing at the upcoming Labour Party Conference.
Thursday, 3 September 2009
How About A Maximum Wage?
We hear much about the minimum wage and how it has been used to drag up the wages of the poorest workers. It was one of the few things Tony Blair deserves a slap on the back for.
What we also hear and screech about is the sky high wages paid to the bosses of these poorest workers, men and women earning tens of millions a year.
So if the Government can impose a minimum wage which says what the least a firm can pay its employees, why can we not have a maximum wage that does the same?
Why pussyfoot around, just slap down a £1m per annum maximum. Nobody could moan about not being able to live on a million a year. The extra goes back into the pot to lower prices or for improvements.
Another idea is to have a pay range that dictates that there must not be more than a x10 discrepancy between the firms top earner and lower earner. That would have the benefit of if the top guys demand an obscene amount in their pay packet, then the little guy also benefits by his wages rising to keep within the range.
The talk seems to be that we are finally coming out the other side of the recession and it seems that nothing has changed whatsoever.
The financial sector is back to paying themselves astronomical bonuses and company bosses are watching their bank balances rise by several noughts. Those who bore the brunt of the recession have lost jobs, homes and in some cases their families, but they still face exactly the same set of circumstances as before only they will have to pay for the misdeeds of others in the way of cuts in services and higher prices.
I say it is unfair that those who can least afford it have to suffer while those who caused all the mess in the first place go back to their previous practises and as it is the mighty pound they seek the most, that's where we should hit them.
If the Government is not prepared to bring about equality by upping the minimum wages, let's do it from the top and have a maximum wage and if the top earners don't like it, let them go stick their noses in someone else's trough and get in people who will.
What we also hear and screech about is the sky high wages paid to the bosses of these poorest workers, men and women earning tens of millions a year.
So if the Government can impose a minimum wage which says what the least a firm can pay its employees, why can we not have a maximum wage that does the same?
Why pussyfoot around, just slap down a £1m per annum maximum. Nobody could moan about not being able to live on a million a year. The extra goes back into the pot to lower prices or for improvements.
Another idea is to have a pay range that dictates that there must not be more than a x10 discrepancy between the firms top earner and lower earner. That would have the benefit of if the top guys demand an obscene amount in their pay packet, then the little guy also benefits by his wages rising to keep within the range.
The talk seems to be that we are finally coming out the other side of the recession and it seems that nothing has changed whatsoever.
The financial sector is back to paying themselves astronomical bonuses and company bosses are watching their bank balances rise by several noughts. Those who bore the brunt of the recession have lost jobs, homes and in some cases their families, but they still face exactly the same set of circumstances as before only they will have to pay for the misdeeds of others in the way of cuts in services and higher prices.
I say it is unfair that those who can least afford it have to suffer while those who caused all the mess in the first place go back to their previous practises and as it is the mighty pound they seek the most, that's where we should hit them.
If the Government is not prepared to bring about equality by upping the minimum wages, let's do it from the top and have a maximum wage and if the top earners don't like it, let them go stick their noses in someone else's trough and get in people who will.
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
Nirvana v Beatles
In my mind, music peaked in the early 90s with the whole grunge thing. For my parents, it was the 60s with the Beatles and the Stones so its especially exciting that The Beatles are being pitted against Nirvana in the latest round of guitar games.
Activision have announced that Nirvana feature as a playable character in Guitar Hero 5 in direct competition with MTV's The Beatles: Rock Band which is released at the same time.
Of course those of us wearing the ripped jeans in 1991 would prefer Kurt's gang over George Harrison's, just as i can assume anyone who was sporting a mop-top in 1964 would take Lennon over Dave Grohl. That's as expected but to compare the two, and to pose the question who was best, is just silly.
Given the choice, i would take Nirvana's music over the Beatles every time but in almost every aspect, the Beatles knock Nirvana into a crocked hat.
If you compare their influence, longevity and record sales, Nirvana are not even in the same country, let alone the ball park. I would take Kurt over Paul McCartney, 'Nevermind' over any Beatles album and 'Smells Like Teen Spirit' over any Beatles single but then anyone of my parents age would do the opposite and that's how it should be. The Beatles were of their time and Nirvana were mine, both had decent songs and both have stinkers.
Asking 'Who was best' is completely subjective and depends on the age group of the person being asked. I imagine if we asked today's kids they would say someone like Coldplay, so let's not ask them. They're obviously idiots.
If you are after the band with the greatest impact then i would suggest the next game is made up of Sex Pistols songs. They kick-started the whole punk movement that influenced most of the guitar bands on the video games today which leads us back to Nirvana who were arguably the best thing in the 90s in terms of music and impact, but best ever is stretching it.
Activision have announced that Nirvana feature as a playable character in Guitar Hero 5 in direct competition with MTV's The Beatles: Rock Band which is released at the same time.
Of course those of us wearing the ripped jeans in 1991 would prefer Kurt's gang over George Harrison's, just as i can assume anyone who was sporting a mop-top in 1964 would take Lennon over Dave Grohl. That's as expected but to compare the two, and to pose the question who was best, is just silly.
Given the choice, i would take Nirvana's music over the Beatles every time but in almost every aspect, the Beatles knock Nirvana into a crocked hat.
If you compare their influence, longevity and record sales, Nirvana are not even in the same country, let alone the ball park. I would take Kurt over Paul McCartney, 'Nevermind' over any Beatles album and 'Smells Like Teen Spirit' over any Beatles single but then anyone of my parents age would do the opposite and that's how it should be. The Beatles were of their time and Nirvana were mine, both had decent songs and both have stinkers.
Asking 'Who was best' is completely subjective and depends on the age group of the person being asked. I imagine if we asked today's kids they would say someone like Coldplay, so let's not ask them. They're obviously idiots.
If you are after the band with the greatest impact then i would suggest the next game is made up of Sex Pistols songs. They kick-started the whole punk movement that influenced most of the guitar bands on the video games today which leads us back to Nirvana who were arguably the best thing in the 90s in terms of music and impact, but best ever is stretching it.
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
Defense Industry Council, DIC's For Short
I would say with almost certainty that when you watched the World news today, one of the items was a conflict somewhere in the World. There is also a very good chance that us good old Brits supplied the weapons to help out but those lovable defence industry bosses have launched a campaign urging whichever party wins the next election to boost spending on equipment to export to other armed forces.
Not for their own selfish reasons of course, but to help Britain out of recession.
The Defence Industries Council warned whoever forms the next government that future prosperity could be jeopardised unless spending on weapons increase.
When a reporter asked why arms spending deserved not only to avoid the impending cuts in public spending but have its budget increased, taking cash from programmes like health and education the reply was 'We are a special case. We create the wealth that funds these public services'.
In 2006 we exported arms to 19 of the 20 countries identified as "countries of concern" for abusing human rights including Saudi Arabia, Israel, Colombia, China, Russia, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey.
We can be proud that the next time we watch the news and see a shell explode into a block of flats or a group of demonstrators cut down by a spray of bullets, that's another step out of recession for us thanks to the Defence Industries Council not having a decent bone in their deplorable body.
Not for their own selfish reasons of course, but to help Britain out of recession.
The Defence Industries Council warned whoever forms the next government that future prosperity could be jeopardised unless spending on weapons increase.
When a reporter asked why arms spending deserved not only to avoid the impending cuts in public spending but have its budget increased, taking cash from programmes like health and education the reply was 'We are a special case. We create the wealth that funds these public services'.
In 2006 we exported arms to 19 of the 20 countries identified as "countries of concern" for abusing human rights including Saudi Arabia, Israel, Colombia, China, Russia, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey.
We can be proud that the next time we watch the news and see a shell explode into a block of flats or a group of demonstrators cut down by a spray of bullets, that's another step out of recession for us thanks to the Defence Industries Council not having a decent bone in their deplorable body.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)