So how did we get here? More than 850 ships and 20,000 sailors are estimated to be trapped in the Gulf since the US and Israel launched their attack on Iran on 28 February and Iran imposed a blockade on foreign shipping using the strait of Hormuz soon afterwards and Trump imposed a counter-blockade of ships using Iranian ports on 13 April.
A Pakistani-brokered ceasefire stopped hostilities but failed to open the Strait and last night the US outlined a plan to guide ships out of the Strait of Hormuz stating it was: 'An humanitarian gesture on behalf of the United States, Middle Eastern countries but, in particular, the country of Iran' although the question was whether it was being done with Iran’s consent or taking place over their heads.
We got the answer this morning when a statement read on Iranian State TV said the strait was: 'Under the control of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran' and went on to warn: 'Any foreign armed forces, especially the aggressive U.S. military, that intends to approach or enter the Strait of Hormuz will be targeted' and then news that two tankers, a UAE and South Korean vessels, have been struck with drones.
Trump has threatened to deal forcefully with any interference with the operation and Iran has since claimed to have fired two missiles at an American warship which forced it to retreat and flee the area which has been denied by a US official's so claim and counterclaim but it very much has the potential to become a very dangerous flashpoint and bring both nations back into direct military confrontation.
Monday, 4 May 2026
Claim And Counterclaim Over Strait Blockade
Hard To Not Dislike Israel
I get tired of pointing out that Israel and Judaism are two very different things and the two should not be conflated but unfortunately many do which is why we saw scenes such as those in London last week when two obviously Jewish men were stabbed and had many Jews complaining that they do not feel safe in Britain.
When the Government said that they would suspend the Pro-Palestine Marches they are guilty of conflating two separate issues although i have been to some of the marches and the rhetoric does range from people peacefully protesting the ongoing Genocide by Israel in Gaza to pure antisemitism
which seems to unite some on the left and the right bizarrely.
We can argue whether it is right to stop the rights of thousands protesting because of a small minority with an intelligence which matches their shoe size but it does open the Government up to accusations of siding with a nation run by a wanted War Criminal who is actually committing a Genocide as we watch but that is for them to decide, i would go with more policing and hauling out any moron who waves an antisemitism banner who shouts out anti Jewish slogans myself rather than ban them but Israel has always had much to answer for and I can't see it getting any better.
Annoyingly, i have to give credit to Piers Morgan for a recent interview with Israeli Politician, Daniella Weiss, which summed up just why the problem with Israel is not going away anytime soon.
in his Interview for his show this week, Piers Morgan Uncensored, he asked her how she felt about over 20,000 Palestinian children being killed since October the 7th in Gaza and it quickly spiraled into this:
DW: I said Palestinians, the Gazans, and all Arabs around should stop attacking Israel.
PM: I just asked you how you felt about 20,000 children being killed by the IDF. How do you feel about that?
DW: I think that that the parents should be very careful before they teach the their children to hate Jews and to kill Jews.
PM: That wasn't my question. My question was, how do you personally feel about over 20,000
Palestinian children now being killed since October the 7th in Gaza? How do you feel about that?
DW: I think that Arabs, Gazans or Jordanians or Syrians, whoever should be very very careful with the way they educate the children.
PM: That wasn't my question. Can you answer my question?
DW: That was my answer.
PM: You don't care? You have no thoughts about these children at all?
DW: You choose your questions and I answer them the way I believe is right.
PM: Just to be clear, you have nothing to say about 20,000 children being killed? Nothing at all.
DW: I have a lot to say about everything that happened as a result of the massacre of the seventh.
PM: Now I understand you care about Israeli children who died as do I. But I'm able
to care about both sides of children who've died. Why don't you care seemingly about the Palestinian children who've died? Why can't you express any sympathy or sorrow or empathy with the children who've died in Gaza? Are you able to do that?
DW: I warn all Arabs from all sides, from all borders, stop educating children to hate.
PM: So, just to be clear, I've now offered you three times.
DW: I made myself very clear.
PM: Oh, you've made yourself very clear
DW: You asked me five times.
PM: I'm going to give you one last chance to offer some empathy or sympathy or sorrow about the deaths of 20,000 children in Gaza. Are you capable of doing that?
DW: I can tell you that had you cared and I don't believe you that that you care a tiny bit about one killed person if you do not use the means that you have as a media person to stop educating children.
PM: I gave you four chances.
DW: You gave me seven.
PM: You couldn't give a damn, could you? You couldn't give a damn. You don't care. And all you want is all the Palestinians gone. You can barely even bring yourself to say their name. All you want is to take over the West Bank and Gaza. You don't care how many die in the process. You want them all gone. You don't care, do you? That's the bottom line.
DW: As you said, the audience will judge.
PM: Yeah, they will.
With people like this in Government, whose solution seems to be for people to stop hating Israel, i cannot see how that is possible when they have killed a minimum of 80,000 people which means there are now the families of all these who have a reason to hate Israel, ask yourself if the military of another nation invaded your country, killed your family and demolished your house, wouldn't you feel immense animosity to them?
How can a people feel anything but hatred towards a nation which has committed a genocide against them and stolen their land for over 80 years? It's a vicious cycle which isn't being helped by the current crop of Israeli smug idiots, morons and simpletons like Netanyahu and Weiss who do not give a damn about the death and destruction they are imparting on other humans in Gaza and the West Bank, imparting so they can steal and take over their land for themselves.
Hamas were wrong for what they have done and have been rightly castigated for it but then so is Israel and we should show sympathy, empathy and utter horror at the numbers killed on both sides but it is near impossible for Gazan's to suddenly stop hating the very nation who have done this and continue to do this to them which is why even if the killing stopped tomorrow, the legacy will continue and Jews around the World will sadly, and very wrongly, suffer.
The Ever Expanding Trump Waistline
It has always been with his stupid hair, strange orange skin, childish temper tantrums, warmongering, blatant lying, small
American's are obviously okay with having a President who looks like he would definitely steal chips off your plate when your back’s turned but looking at the recent pictures, 244lbs is optimistic but let's go with that figure which means he is still the third fattest US President after 340 pounds or 24 stones of William Taft who was so large he once got stuck in the presidential bathtub, followed by Grover Cleveland who broke the scales at 280 pounds or 20 stones.
Although he has a long way to go to catch up with the Tubby Taft, if we suspend sense and take the 17.4 stone figure as true, Cleveland is an achievable 3 stone away and if he keeps tucking into the burgers and cola's like he does, then he may be able to add second fattest President to his already impressive CV of firsts including dumbest in front of George W Bush and most perverted ahead of John F Kennedy.
Now i'm not medically trained but i would hazard a guess it's down to him binging on fast food and drinking up to a dozen Cokes a day while following an exercise regime which includes lifting Big Mac's to his mouth as to why he looks like a human shaped wad of cholesterol which has come to life to wreak havoc on the people of own nation.
While there is much speculation about his general health, most of which seems to range from a rapid decline into dementia to him keeling over and clutching his chest at any moment, i for one support Trump's appetite to make the America President not fit into its trousers again because either his waistline continues to expand to Taft proportions or his arteries decide they have had enough and pack up, but i am confident that he has the stomach for a fight even though he has much on his plate and it is an achievement i am backing him for, larger bathtub not withstanding. Go Chubby!!!!
Last Chance For Labour
I will make a prediction and that is that this weeks Local Elections on Thursdays will see the incumbent Labour Party get a Royal Shellacking and it will spell the end of Keir Starmer who will be replaced by either Angela Raynor, Wes Streeting, Andy Burnham or Ed Miliband but each comes with baggage so it's going to be a scrap for either of them.
After arriving with a massive majority of 174, the Labour Party could literally get anything through the Commons but Starmer has been far too cautious and has squandered his opportunity and unless things change drastically, they could find themselves back out of power again after the next election but not swapping places wituh the Conservatives as usually happens, because Britain seems to have become a multi party democracy.
In what is beginning to look like a fragmented multi-party system, five parties now poll at meaningful national levels, Labour, the Conservatives, Reform, the Lib Dems and the Greens and that is alongside the SNP in Scotland and Plaid Cymru in Wales.
Curiously what polls show is that combined support for left-leaning parties (Labour, the Lib Dems and the Greens) stand at between 43% and 47% since the last election while the right-leaning bloc (the Conservatives and Reform) has hovered between 44% and 49% so it isn't left and right leaning voters switching ideology, they are shifting within their ideology meaning that the overall balance of left and right doesn’t hugely change.
At the last election the Conservative vote left in droves to switch to Reform while the switch from Labour has gone to the Greens and Lib Dems which immediately puts them at a disadvantage as the 43%-47% is split 3 ways while the right wing 44%-49% is split between two.
Unless Labour, The Greens or Lib Dems can coalesce the left under their own banner, Reform will probably sneak through by default because they do seem to have done a good job of attracting the former Conservative voters to their side and leaving Conservative Party flapping in the wind but one thing the left do have great success with is tactical voting which may yet save us from the disaster that would be suffering under a Prime Minister Nigel Farage but that is for the next election, this Thursday is going to see Labour get a thumping and one final chance to get it right under another, more Labour Party, leader.
Special Guest Blogger: Lord Henry Darnley
To some i was that husband Mary, Queen of Scots had before the really interesting one, the one who was murdered, blown up in a house which was quite theatrical, if I do say so. A shame I wasn’t awake to appreciate it. Or present for the aftermath. Or, you know, breathing.
It all began with my birth like most lives but i was a great-grandson of Henry VII on my mother’s side and i grew up to be a strapping six footer with the chestnut, flowing hair of a Renaissance painting and oh how I danced!
I arrived in Scotland in 1561 like a dashing, slightly sweaty knight in satin hose. Mary, my cousin and Scotland’s queen, was newly widowed and in need of a husband. And a baby. And possibly a good chat. I brought two out of three. The third? Let’s just say I wasn’t the greatest listener.
We married in 1565. A match made in heaven or possibly in the fevered scheming of various European nobles who thought uniting two claimants to the English throne under one roof sounded like solid diplomacy but it turned out to be more like stuffing a mongoose and a snake into a velvet sack and leaving them to get along.
At first, all was well. Mary adored me. I adored myself. We had a son (James—later King James VI of Scotland and, amusingly, James I of England). I strutted. I preened. I demanded the Crown Matrimonial, which would’ve made me co-ruler. Mary said no. I pouted. I threw tantrums that would embarrass a toddler denied his pudding.
Then came Rizzio, Mary’s private secretary, friend, and confidant but most importantly someone not me who enjoyed the queen’s attention. I admit, I may have taken out my jealousy in the most dramatic form possible, conspiring to have the man murdered in front of the pregnant queen. Yes. That happened. In a small room. With knives. While Mary watched. Not my best look.
Things went downhill faster than a Scotsman on ice skates. Mary, understandably cross about the whole bloody murder in my dining room incident, distanced herself. I responded by getting even more sulkier. I took to my bed with some mysterious illness and became less of a king-consort and more of a lavishly dressed invalid hiding in his bedroom.
Then, on the night of February 9th, 1567, I was staying at the Kirk o’ Field, a modest house just outside Edinburgh. Mary had gone to visit her friend. I stayed behind to have a good sulk and plotting my next temper tantrum when boom. The house exploded.
I wasn’t even killed by the blast. I was found in the garden, strangled. So, someone went to all the trouble of rigging explosives to presumably to make it look like an accident only to then manually have to throttle me.
To this day, historians can’t agree who did it. Was it Mary? (tragic queen, beheaded, romantic but unlikely), Elizabeth I of England (Virgin Queen, patron of the arts, destroyer of Spanish fleets but doubtful) Mary's future husband, Bothwell? (dashing villain, accused of everything so probably) or was it simply the universe’s way of saying, i had worn out my welcome?
I did leave behind a son who united two crowns which further serves as a cautionary tale about marrying your own cousin and never trusting a Scot with a match near your bedroom.
Sunday, 3 May 2026
Welcome To The EU Canada
It is the pure bad luck of geography that Canada finds itself a neighbour of the United States while the nutty right wing facists are in control and unless the tectonic plates are going into overdrive soon, there is nothing they can do about it but they have been making eyes at the EU recently and the EU have been winking and playing footsie straight back at them.
With the sex pest (probable) pedophile in the White House handing out tariffs and generally treating Canada the same way as he does Moscow Hotel mattresses, last month, France’s foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot floated the idea that Canada could one day join the European Union, with Finnish president Alexander Stubb likewise suggesting to Canadian prime minister Mark Carney that he should think about joining the EU.
In a February 2026 poll conducted by Abacus Data it found that 48% of Canadians support Canada becoming a member of the EU and that the feeling is reciprocated on our side of the Atlantic with the five largest EU member states, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain, all saying that they would support admitting Canada to the European Union.
The most obvious obstacle to Canadian accession to the EU is geography and Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union limits membership to 'European states' which is a problem for a North American country.
That said Canada does have partnerships with the EU such as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) which lowers tariffs, expands market access and created mechanisms for regulatory cooperation and investment protection and there are nations outside of the EU (Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and to some degree the UK) who have treaties signed with the EU so things are possible outside of actual membership.
Another option could be to expand the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) between Canada and the EU which was signed in 2016, and was designed to 'deepen and broaden bilateral cooperation on a wide range of issues such as international peace and security, counter-terrorism, human rights and nuclear non-proliferation, clean energy and climate change, migration and peaceful pluralism, sustainable development, and innovation'.
Obviously opening the EU up to nations outside of Europe could be a sore point and bring all sorts of problems but i'd be open to it, just as long as it doesn't give them a free pass to the Eurovision Song Contest, that would be a step too far for the nation that gave us Bryan Adams and Justin Bieber.
Saturday, 2 May 2026
Why Nuclear Power At All?
When it comes to Nuclear Power, i am very much undecided as on the one hand it is clean energy compared to fossil fuels but then it does create waste which remains dangerous for tens of thousands of years and if their is an accident at the plants...all out disaster, the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 spread radiation across Europe and substantial parts of Belarus and Ukraine are still cordoned off today.
A poll by YouGov 40 years on from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, shows that i am not the only one with Britons divided on whether nuclear energy is safe.
The Government have recently given the green light to a new power station in Anglesey but around half of Brits (51%) generally support the use of nuclear power with 37% saying we should actively be getting more of its energy from nuclear with 23% believing the UK should reduce the amount of electricity it gets from nuclear energy.
The big take away is that nuclear has fewer enthusiasts than renewable energy sources with 55% wanting the UK to get more of its energy from onshore wind, 63% favouring more energy from bio-fuel and geothermal sources, 67% wanting more offshore wind or hydro-electric power, and 73% backing more electricity being generated through tidal and solar power.
As the Chernobyl disaster demonstrated, nuclear power stations do have the potential to go very badly wrong and 45% believe that today's nuclear energy is typically safe and it may well be but the highly toxic waste, currently we have 4.58 million cubic meters, enough to fill Wembley, which we are struggling to deal with (currently it is in storage while trying to develop a long-term solution to bury it) which has a half life ranging between decades and 100,000 years so until that problem is sorted, generating even more seems we are merely switching a problem of polluting the air to polluting the ground.
Why we are not putting as much money and resources into renewable sources as we do nuclear is a question for the politicians but it does seem madness to be looking at a nuclear answer when ramping up the much cleaner and safer wind, solar and tidal power is the obvious solution.
Special Guest Blogger: Marcus Junius Brutus
My life was a tragicomic romp through power, betrayal, and the eternal struggle to outwit a man who clearly needed to learn the meaning of the word moderation.
My family name was as esteemed as a boiled asparagus as in it was rare, revered, and occasionally stabbed with a fork. The Brutus's were Rome’s answer to a well-tailored toga as we were conservative, respectable, and slightly stiff at dinner parties. My ancestors could have founded a bank, but instead, they opted for the more dramatic career of assassination conspiracy starters. (My great-uncle once poisoned a rival by hiding poison in a fig).
Growing up, I was drilled with the virtues of libertas or freedom and the necessity of looking very solemn in public portraits. I mastered the art of the deadpan stare by age 12 which set the stage for my most esteemed career choice: political theater.
Now, let’s talk about the man I’ll forever be linked to, Julius Caesar. A brilliant general? Undoubtedly. A master of self-promotion? Beyond reproach but by the time Caesar returned to Rome, he was as popular as a chariot salesman at a gladiator’s birthday party.
My problem with Caesar was he had the ego of a man who’d just been anointed by Zeus himself and he was exhausting. In hindsight, maybe I should’ve sent him a strongly worded letter but instead, I joined a stabbing circle.
Assassinating a leader is never a decision to make lightly or, you know, at all. But there we were, a ragtag group of senators with more spears than sense, plotting in the shadow of Caesar’s growing tyranny.
The day of the assassination was a masterclass in chaos. I arrived at the Senate with a heart full of conviction and a sleeve full of daggers. Caesar, ever the drama queen, walked in looking suspiciously unimpressed by the 40-something men lurking in togas. When I finally plunged my blade into his back, he muttered, 'Et tu, Brute?' which is a line that would later be overquoted by Shakespearean actors.
So was I the good guy who did it for Rome or the bad guy who betrayed his best mate but in my defence Caesar was a terrible leader although after Caesar’s death, things unraveled. Antony, our friend’s rival, turned the people against me with a speech that made me sound like the villain and i fled to Greece, raised an army, and faced Antony at the Battle of Philippi.
Spoiler: I lost. Spectacularly and my final moments were a mix of dignity, bad swordsmanship, and a truly dreadful last speech. I’d scripted something inspiring about liberty and legacy, but I died with my head held high, especially when it was cut off and held up for the baying crowd to see.
Friday, 1 May 2026
Europe Celebrating
Donald Trump: Those European countries are absolutely horrible to refuse to support our war in Iran so I'm going to withdraw US troops from Europe.
Europe: Woo Hoo.
Donald Trump: I mean it, no more US Troops in Europe.
Europe: We heard. Very sad, boo hoo, so do you need a hand packing?
Donald Trump: Do you understand what that means?
Europe: Yep, hey Macron, got the Champagne?
Donald Trump: I'm not joking.
Europe: Are you still here?
Donald Trump: If you won't help me in my war why should we have Troops there?
Europe: Good point, so you promise not to come back? No crossed fingers or anything?
Donald Trump: No, gone forever.
Europe: And you are promising that? You don't have a great reputation for telling the truth you know.
Donald Trump: I swear it.
Europe: Result!! So long, farewell Auf Wiederseh'n, adieu
Donald Trump: <silence>
Europe: Has he gone or just fallen asleep again?
Donald Trump: <silence>
Europe: Frederiksen, Macron, Merz, Meloni, Sánchez, grab a bottle and head to Downing Street. Its Party Time!!!!
Antidisestablishmentarianism
The Church of England is the established state church, with King Charles III as its Supreme Governor and 26 bishops sitting in the House of Lords so there is a close relationship with the state which means that as an establishment, the state can withdrawal it's recognition known as disestablishment which will annoy some churchy types who will try to oppose it which is called antidisestablishmentarianism.
Yep, i had to Google all that but the serious point is that as Church numbers fall to unsustainable levels, why is the Church of England still holding such sway over matters when only a small percentage of us actually pay any attention to it?
So to some antidisestablishmentarianisers (made up word?), they don't believe that establishments such as the CoE should be disestablished but if many of us had our way, we would remove all traces of religion from having any representation with the State which makes them supporting prosestablishmentarianism i guess but whatever, it isn't going to happen so it's all actually floccinaucinihilipilification but at least having a word like antidisestablishmentarianism bandied around annoys the people with hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia, and that's worth something.