World Reaction To American Warmongering

As the Mango Moron in the White House finds himself in such esteemed company as Putin in Russia and Netanyahu in Isreal as invaders you would expect the rest of the World to be rightly condemning America's latest occupation of an oil rich country and it did spark an influx of comments from some, but others weirdly disapproved but in such as way as not to criticise the man who only a few weeks ago was crying about not receiving a peace prize.
Slaps on the back and a well done from Israeli Prime Minister, War Criminal and Genocide committer Benjamin Netanyahu who said: 'I salute your decisive resolve and the brilliant action of your brave soldiers' and the Terracotta Tyrant's pal in Argentina, President Javier Milei made straight for the Trump colon by calling it: 'Excellent news for the free world'.
On the disapprove but don't upset the Fuscha Fascist are Colombia (deeply concerned) and Spain who said: 'The situation in Venezuela must be resolved exclusively by peaceful means, through dialogue, negotiation, and respect for the will of the Venezuelan people in all its expressions, without external interference and in accordance with international law' while French President Emmanuel Macron said the transition: 'Must be peaceful, democratic, and respectful of the will of the Venezuelan people'.
Outright condemnation came from China who said they were: 'Deeply shocked and strongly condemns the use of force by the U.S. against a sovereign country and the use of force against the president of a country' and Russia who accused America with a straight face that they had: 'Committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela' and called the pretexts used to justify such actions as 'Unfounded' and 'Ideological'.
Brazilian President, Luiz Inacio Da Silva, said America had: 'Crossed an unacceptable line' and was 'A grave affront to Venezuela's sovereignty' and the Belarus President ,Alexander Lukashenko reached for the Caps Lock to type on Social Media that 'The President of Belarus CATEGORICALLY CONDEMNS the act of American aggression against Venezuela'.
Uruguay said it: 'Rejects, military intervention by one country in the territory of another' and Chile's President, Gabriel Boric said they: 'Express our concern and condemnation of the military actions of the United States in Venezuela'.
The Iranians, as expected, said they: 'Condemned the U.S. attack on Venezuela as a blatant violation of its national sovereignty and territorial integrity' and Malaysia said they: 'Opposes all forms of foreign intervention in the internal affairs of other States, as well as the threat or use of force'.
Cuba President, Miguel Diaz-Canel issued a sharply worded condemnation, accusing Washington of carrying out: 'A criminal attack against Venezuela' which they described as 'state terrorism directed at the Venezuelan people' and Mexico kept it simple with: 'Mexico condemns the military intervention in Venezuela'.
Offering no comment at all were Germany's Friedrich Merz and the UK's Keir Strarmer with Merz saying they will take their time to evaluate what happened and the UK's Keir Starmer was keen to ensure Brits that the UK Government was not involved whatsoever and he would: 'Want to establish the facts first but international law should be upheld' and the European Commission, Canada, Guyana, Italy, Belgium, Paraguay, Indonesia and Denmark who all said they were: 'Monitoring developments closely' while Trinidad and Tabago were also keen to let it known that they: 'Were NOT a participant in any of these ongoing military operations'
Most nations pointed towards International Law and the United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, said he: 'Emphasized the importance of full respect, by all, of international law, including the UN Charter' and was 'Deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected'. Assuming he meant  Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations which states: 'The UN and its members must follow, focusing on sovereign equality of states, good faith fulfillment of obligations, peaceful settlement of disputes, refraining from threats or force, non-intervention in domestic matters (except when peace is threatened), and cooperation with the UN, ensuring even non-member states respect these principles for peace. Key aspects include sovereign equality (Art. 2(1)), peaceful dispute resolution (Art. 2(3)), and the prohibition of the use of force (Art. 2(4)).
Obviously as the USA has a veto at the United Nations and as we found out with Iraq and Afghanistan, they can get away with literal murder, so nothing will happen there but FIFA might want to rethink the peace prize they handed to the Apricot Arsehole sex pest after this weekend.