The UK Supreme Court have reached a judgement on what makes a woman a woman and clarified that the definition of a persons sex was purely biological in character but should it really take the highest Court in the land to tell us what nature already decides?
It was strange to see celebrations on the judgement and some people calling it a victory for truth and feminism when it is obviously a conflation of a persons sex and their gender.
The definition of a woman is ultimately a biological one and comes down to Chromosomes, XX you are female, XY and you are a male and it really shouldn't be this difficult with politicians tying themselves up in knots about wombs and ovaries and genitalia.
While you can never change your sex as that is biologically cast while in the womb and you are destined to forever have the pair of Chromosomes you were dealt, you can change your gender but that is a whole other discussion and this does nothing to quell that as we will still have the problems such as pronouns, toilets or changing rooms but ultimately it is down to the person involved to identify with whatever gender they feel more comfortable with as the ruling from the World Health Organisation defines.
Last year the NHS announced that they will be using the medical definition of a persons sex and will be working towards same sex hospital wards based on the patients biological sex so as the Courts decision was based on biology, feels a case of we knew that already so I am a bit confused over what people were actually celebrating.
Saturday, 19 April 2025
Celebrating What Exactly?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
conflating ideas is the classic leftist strategy, as well as, conflating truth and lies. it goes without saying that this is same strategy used by journalists, but i like to take every opportunity to remind the world that journalists cannot be trusted. the descending order of trustworthiness: all other professions, scientists, used car salespeople, lawyers, politicians, journalists (dead last and well earned).
are you implying that, in the uk, people haven't tried to challenge the idea that there are only two sexes?
American leftists were pushing hard to impose the idea on the nation that there are more than two sexes with much support from the democratic party, joe biden, kamala harris, journalists, et al.
further, the same leftists were filing discrimination lawsuits against companies and executives if employees were allowed to express the idea that there were only two sexes. similarly, the left was suing companies and executives if a company tried to enforce old standards like men's and women's restrooms...
the left here was also imposing the inane idea that a man can have a baby, again with support from the leftists (same as journalists) and the democratic party.
maybe that is why this tripe has reached the uk supreme court (isn't still that why yawl have a king?).
As I keep saying, don’t judge all journalists by the low standards of your own,
90% of my experience with uk journalism is from interactions with you which includes:
> unverifiable sources,
> rumor,
> quotes out of context,
> biased fact selection,
> character attacks on individuals,
> repeated use of debunked facts,
> ignoring errors and personal flaws of leftists
not a very good record...
Yet when I ask for examples you go quiet….hmmmmmm
Post a Comment