Monday, 27 October 2025

Iraq War Blueprint Being Used For War In Venezuela?

Since the start of September, the Trump administration has busied itself with blowing up boats in international waters stemming from Venezuela under the guise that, according to them, they are carrying narcotics cargo destined for consumers in the United States.
Donald Trump called it an action 'of self-defense' against 'unlawful combatants' motivated by 'the inability or unwillingness of some states in the region to address the continuing threat to United States persons and interests emanating from their territories.'
Obviously, as a man who lies as easily as he breathes, it should be delved into but the American media is either unwilling or just too damn awful to dig into it and see if Trump is not just pushing the envelope but shredding it to bits and if he is, why?
Firstly, International Law experts are saying that the actions break all sorts of international law violations from the physical violation of another state’s sovereignty and wrongful intervention in a sovereign states affairs and violates Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter and customary law.
Secondly, if the intention is to curb overdoses on U.S. soil from drug use, fentanyl is the largest culprit and the vast majority of that crosses into the US hails across the border from Mexico, not South America but telling is the Trump assertion that Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro is the leader of a drug trafficking organisation although no evidence has been provided.
Everyone is who anyone involved in the Drugs War states that Venezuela isn't involved in this fentanyl business in any meaningful way and the Mexican cartels certainly don't share the market with anyone, and certainly not with Venezuela.  
Venezuela is a large supplier of other illegal drugs but not as much as the much more significant drug producing countries like Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia, which are the largest producers of the coca leaf in the world which cocaine is made from and transport through Venezuela and then mainly leave the country from ports on the northern coast of the country.
America's own intelligence Community disputes this and the National Intelligence Council head,  Michael Collins, was sacked when he pointed this out and Trump went on to continue with the them by saying that  he had authorised the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct covert lethal operations on Venezuelan soil and more broadly through the Caribbean, saying: 'We are certainly looking at land now, because we’ve got the sea well under control'.
He has ordered a growing military presence threateningly close to Venezuela so what is going on in that age addled brain of Trump?
Intelligence states that these boats from Venezuela are not heading to the US and that many of the boats targeted for strikes by the Trump administration do not even have the requisite fuel or motor capacity to reach the U.S, but are mainly heading to the nearby islands of Trinidad and Tobago, and from there they largely go to West Africa and Europe.
It's widely accepted the two most exported drugs from South America are cocaine and marijuana and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in the US says that synthetic opioids like fentanyl are responsible for most overdose deaths there and fentanyl is not produced in South America, whatever the president says.
So is he mistaken and misinformed, or does he has another motive.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is a fervent supporter of the Venezuelan opposition, the recent winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, María Corina Machado, who must be salivating at the prospect of regime change and Rubio has been pushing for Venezuela's president Nicolas Maduro to be toppled for years now, redirecting millions of dollars in money previously allocated for “pro-democracy” measures in Venezuela.
A few weeks ago,  Maduro offered to turn over some of his nations oil resources to the U.S. in exchange for a cessation of hostilities, another that Trump himself acknowledged, telling reporters that: 'Maduro offered everything. You know why? Because he doesn’t want to fuck around with the United States' but Trump rejected the offer, Rubio making the argument that the best way to secure Venezuela’s oil reserves was to facilitate regime change in Venezuela and make a better deal with a new government.
So while Trump and his gang continues to insist their military manoeuvres are simply part of a wider counter drugs operation, it's hard to imagine that getting rid of an 'unfriendly' leader in a country with huge oil reserves, the largest in the world, to bring in a 'friendly' leader in the opposition who they can do business with, is not part of their equation.
In echoes of George W Bush's war in Iraq, the pieces are being moved into place, the lies are being spluttered and the useful idiots are repeating them while a next to useless media refuses to ask the obvious questions and the self-proclaimed peace maker in the White House could be preparing America for a war with Venezuela and following the same, blood stained and disastrous blueprint used by Bush and Blair in 2003.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

“…but the American media is either unwilling or just too damn awful to dig into it…”.
> The AP and NYT have had nearly daily headlines about this for weeks now. You appear uninformed.
. . .
“Firstly, International Law experts are saying that the actions break all sorts of international law violations from the physical violation of another state’s sovereignty and wrongful intervention in a sovereign states affairs and violates Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter and customary law.”
> what “international law experts”? Iranian, Russian, Chinese, UN experts?
. . .
“…the vast majority of that crosses into the US hails across the border from Mexico…”
> okay. so. we are already dealing with the sources in other nations… time to deal with venezuela
. . .
“…although no evidence has been provided.”
> so? this isn’t a court room. drug cartels and enemies don’t follow “rules of evidence” except to gain support for their illegal actions…
. . .
“Venezuela is a large supplier of other illegal drugs…”
> your own words. justifies action in the view of normal people.
. . .
“America's own intelligence Community disputes this and the National Intelligence Council head, Michael Collins, was sacked when he pointed this out…”
> the US has thousands of analysts in 23 or is it 26 different agencies. the responsibilities of the agencies intentionally overlap leading to any viewpoint desired - especially when a democrat politician asks an analyst to write a dissenting view, then “leaks” the dissent, then provides political cover for the analyst.
> the NIC leadership reports to the president. Public dissent is grounds for dismissal…
. . .
“Intelligence states that these boats from Venezuela are not heading to the US…”
> whose intelligence states this?
. . .
“US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is a fervent supporter of the Venezuelan opposition, the recent winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, María Corina Machado, who must be salivating at the prospect of regime change and Rubio has been pushing for Venezuela's president Nicolas Maduro to be toppled for years now, redirecting millions of dollars in money previously allocated for “pro-democracy” measures in Venezuela.”
> What is the message in this glob of words?
> are you implying mad dog maduro is working on “pro-democracy” efforts… bullshit
. . .
”…it's hard to imagine that getting rid of an 'unfriendly' leader in a country with huge oil reserves, the largest in the world, to bring in a 'friendly' leader in the opposition who they can do business with, is not part of their equation.”
> try harder. their oil is low grade. in fact, few nations have refineries that can process the venezuelan oil (US may be the only nation that can process the low-grade venezuelan oil…).
> the US has surplus petroleum now - an exporter… the left seemingly can’t get over the idea that everything is about “oil”
. . .
“In echoes of George W Bush's war in Iraq, the pieces are being moved into place, the lies are being spluttered and the useful idiots are repeating them while a next to useless media refuses to ask the obvious questions and the self-proclaimed peace maker in the White House could be preparing America for a war with Venezuela and following the same, blood stained and disastrous blueprint used by Bush and Blair in 2003.”
> first, more banal leftist drivel.
> second, how is the ‘blueprint” the same?
> i’ve noticed that you seem to think “useful idiots” only exist on one side of any political equation.

Anonymous said...

now, a bit of real geopolitical analysis.

russia, pissed off by US sanctions and eu restrictions (after much pressure from the US for the eu to stop being two-faced - financing the russian invasion of ukraine by buying russian energy) is making rumbles about increasing its involvement in the western hemisphere (cuba and venzuela specifically).

at the same time, the chinese are trying to increase their influence in the western hemisphere. for example, their recent involvement in panama canal.

such actions by russia and china create risks for US security. the US has protection to the east and west provided by the atlantic and pacific oceans, as well as thick forest and lakes to the north in canada. the biggest exposure for the US is enemies that can block trade routes (50% of US trade) going in and out of the gulf of mexico. cuba and venezuela are positioned to block gulf of mexico trade routes. the US will not let this risk escalate.

and, maduro is a dick.

so two good reasons to remind the russians, chinese, cubans, and venezuelans about reality...