Back in the mid 80s when i began joining the Environmentalists in making people alert on Climate Change, there wasn't that many people who argued against it. Well, they couldn't argue against the science as the evidence for a warming climate was conclusive and almost every scientist who wasn't in the pay of the fossil fuel lobby agreed but the more denser amongst us wanted to rage against something because they saw saving the planet as a Green, lefty thing.
They tried denying it but couldn't so they tried to deny it was man made and the climate changes over time anyway but again science proved that was rubbish and recently there has been the view that it is happening and nothing we can do about it anyway but the latest thing is raging against Net Zero.
Interestingly when i have queried these people exactly what Net Zero is they don't actually know, just parrot fashion repeating what loonies like Nigel Farage of Reform UK is saying, the same Reform UK that received £2.3 million from oil and gas interests which could explain why they are keen to rubbish anything that their paymasters feel will harm their profits
The moronic useful idiots then have jumped upon a bandwagon that will see some businesses continue to make obscene profits while the World literally burns and what would otherwise be amusing it it was so catastrophic, they don't even understand why.
For the hard of thinking, Climate Change is the direct result of there being too much Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere so we must stop emitting more and even remove some of it and that could be through mass tree planting and carbon capture devices that suck out carbon dioxide from the air so if we deploy carbon dioxide removal techniques at the same time as reducing our burning of fossil fuels, we can slow global warming.
Hopefully around the middle of this century we will achieve 'net zero' which is the point at which emissions of greenhouse gases are balanced by technologies removing them from the atmosphere.
The first mention i could find of Climate Change was in 1824 when French physicist Joseph Fourier warned of the Earth's natural 'greenhouse effect' and in 1861 the Irish physicist John Tyndall showed that certain gases such as Carbon create the greenhouse effect.
In 1958 Environmental scientists begins measurements of atmospheric CO2 and show that at 315ppm, CO2 concentrations are rising and in 1965 (320 ppm) a US President's Advisory Committee panel warned that the greenhouse effect 'is a matter of real concern' and in 1990, an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report said with CO2 at 354 ppm, temperatures have risen by 0.3-0.6C over the last century due to humanity's emissions.
Since then we have been through numerous Earth Summit's, Kyoto Protocols, Climate Change Conferences and Environmental agreements but still the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere continues to grow and each wasted year meant humanity was rapidly running out of time.
If we had acted on the first warning at the time, we would have been able to decarbonise our societies at a rate of around 2% a year to limit warming to no more than 1.5°C and if Governments had acted in 1861, 1958 or even 1990 then we would have had a fighting chance of slowing Global Warning but here we are in 2025 and at 425ppm, and the number of lives lost to more intense storms, fires, heatwaves, famines and floods are significantly increasing.
The fact that we have done nothing to limit the CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere means that we have to act now and in as quick as possible because our lives literally depend on it so blame the previous World Governments for it being so urgent now because nobody can say we haven't been warned over the past century, they have just selfishly and ignorantly done nothing about it.
Thursday, 15 May 2025
We Were Warned
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
yawn. boring.
do you believe the tripe you wrote here?
one big reason scientists in the mid-80's were not challenged was because nobody cared. another factor was that less than 5 years earlier scientists were saying we were facing global cooling - using "irrefutable" science... meanwhile scientists were saying eggs and fat were bad for our health. good thing we believed that because we would all be morbidly obese today if we hadn't gone to low fat diets (like that has worked).
so, the science you claim was irrefutable was in fact seriously doubted at the time, by scientists.
while being "green" was a lefty thing, it was not pursued because it was impractical to stop using oil/gas, oh, and lefties killed the development of new nuclear power plants.
so, in the 1980's what did we have for energy if we stop using oil/gas and nuclear? nothing, but leftist idiots live in la la imaginary land.
obscene profit. you don't seem to have a clue about how a profit is earned and how scale impacts profit. due to globalism and the www businesses have 10x or more the opportunity to scale their businesses and that is what is leading to "obscene" profits.
when you "query" people about "net zero"... funny, like you know. recently, you haven't been able to articulate what socialism is or what genocide is, so how would you know what "net zero" is?
"For the hard of thinking, Climate Change is the direct result of there being too much Carbon Dioxide..."
For the hard of thinking, one variable contributing to climate change (why would you capitalize it?) is carbon dioxide and not all of it comes from humans...
this definition is weak "...the point at which emissions of greenhouse gases are balanced by technologies removing them from the atmosphere." it doesn't account for non-technology avenues like increasing co2 consuming flora. though i must admit this is the best definition i've ever seen from you on any topic.
"rapidly running out of time"... define rapidly. nice passive language disinformation word. which you should use because the "scientific" models haven't performed well at predicting global climate doom. remember when your boy al gore and the un said 2014 as the end of life?
"in 2025 and at 425ppm, and the number of lives lost to more intense storms, fires, heatwaves, famines and floods are significantly increasing." blah blah blah, more unsubstantiated blather from leftists - correlation and observation are the basis for hypothesis, they are not proof. perhaps one day you will get that. perhaps you won't.
just another leftists diatribe based on selected information, biased views, and twisted truths.
That’s a fine example of the hard of thinking I was talking about. You nailed it, congratulations!
Yeah, I understand nuanced analysis of your blunt comments is hard for you to process
Post a Comment